ORAL AND POSTER ABSTRACT REVIEWER INSTRUCTIONS
Reviews Due: Friday, January 6
Oral Presentation Review Instructions
Step 1:
- Score each of the abstracts based on the review criteria.
Each criteria is on a scale (min : 1 | max : 10), maximum 50 points per abstract. - Determine if the oral presentation type and focus area listed are appropriate.
REVIEW CRITERIA - click to view
RELEVANCE OF TOPIC
Is the topic of relevance, importance, value, and/or interest to the academic prevention and public health community?
Is the topic of relevance, importance, value, and/or interest to the academic prevention and public health community?
PROPOSED TOPIC ALIGN WITH OBJECTIVES:
Does the proposal adequately cover content related to the learning objectives?
Does the proposal adequately cover content related to the learning objectives?
INNOVATIVE
Does the proposal present new ideas or is the topic cutting edge?
Does the proposal present new ideas or is the topic cutting edge?
EVIDENCE-BASE
Does it contain proven and effective evidence-based practices? Does it include results or a plan for evaluation?
Does it contain proven and effective evidence-based practices? Does it include results or a plan for evaluation?
CLARITY
Clarity, depth and specificity of proposal
Clarity, depth and specificity of proposal
Step 2:
In the comment box state one of the following:
1. Can a 30-minute panel be promoted to a stand-alone 45-minute seminar?
2. Is a workshop better suited as a seminar or panel?
3. Should a presentation become a roundtable? (i.e., Topic is of interest but may have insufficient data or results.)
4. Should focus area be changed: Curriculum and Faculty Development, Prevention and Population Health Improvement, Collaboration and Engagement, Advocacy and Policy, and Special Topics
In the comment box state one of the following:
- Accept-No change
- Accept-Change presentation type
- Accept-Change focus area
- Reject-Move to poster presentation
- Reject-All Together
1. Can a 30-minute panel be promoted to a stand-alone 45-minute seminar?
2. Is a workshop better suited as a seminar or panel?
3. Should a presentation become a roundtable? (i.e., Topic is of interest but may have insufficient data or results.)
4. Should focus area be changed: Curriculum and Faculty Development, Prevention and Population Health Improvement, Collaboration and Engagement, Advocacy and Policy, and Special Topics
ORAL PRESENTATION TYPES - Click to view
Panel
30-minute presentation including discussion and/or Q & A. Presentations will be grouped to form a larger session. Projects and initiatives should be completed or well underway and not be in the early brainstorming or early implementation stages.
Seminar
45-minute stand-alone presentation on collaborative work, including discussion and/or Q & A. Projects and initiatives should be completed or well underway and not be in the early brainstorming or early implementation stages. The Lead Presenter is responsible for coordinating the panel presentations in advance.
Roundtable
45-minute facilitated discussion that engages participants around a precise topic or theme. Presentations may include ideas in development that are relevant to the conference theme. A roundtable might provide an opportunity for collective problem solving of an identified challenge. The abstract submission should include a summary describing the problem or issue, its significance, the questions to be posed, and a plan for engaging the participants.
Workshop
60-minute activity that engages the participants in facilitated activities and exercises to increase the participants’ competence or understanding in a particular area. This presentation is generally focused on skill-building. When submitting your presentation proposal please indicate your workshop objectives, agenda, and the participation processes.
30-minute presentation including discussion and/or Q & A. Presentations will be grouped to form a larger session. Projects and initiatives should be completed or well underway and not be in the early brainstorming or early implementation stages.
Seminar
45-minute stand-alone presentation on collaborative work, including discussion and/or Q & A. Projects and initiatives should be completed or well underway and not be in the early brainstorming or early implementation stages. The Lead Presenter is responsible for coordinating the panel presentations in advance.
Roundtable
45-minute facilitated discussion that engages participants around a precise topic or theme. Presentations may include ideas in development that are relevant to the conference theme. A roundtable might provide an opportunity for collective problem solving of an identified challenge. The abstract submission should include a summary describing the problem or issue, its significance, the questions to be posed, and a plan for engaging the participants.
Workshop
60-minute activity that engages the participants in facilitated activities and exercises to increase the participants’ competence or understanding in a particular area. This presentation is generally focused on skill-building. When submitting your presentation proposal please indicate your workshop objectives, agenda, and the participation processes.
Step 3:
Please include any additional comments that may help with the review.
Please include any additional comments that may help with the review.
Poster & Student Lightning Round Review Instructions
Step 1:
- Score each of the abstracts based on the review criteria indicated in the Scorecard.
Each criteria is on a scale (min : 1 | max : 10), maximum 50 points per abstract.
Relevance of Topic
Is the topic of relevance, importance, value, and/or interest to the academic prevention and public health community?
Proposed Topic Align with ojectives
Does the proposal adequately cover content related to the learning objectives?
Evidence-base
Is the topic innovative or does it contain evidence-based practices?
Impact
Does the proposal include results or plan for evaluation?
Clarity
Clarity, depth and specificity of proposal
Step 2:
In the comment box state:
In the comment box state:
- Accept
- Accept-Poster Only (Applies only to student posters that want to be considered for an oral Lightning Round presentation)
- Reject
POSTER AND STUDENT LIGHTNING ROUND PRESENTATIONS - CLICK TO VIEW
Posters provide the opportunity to display research studies, practicum projects, or outcomes of educational or curricular projects pertinent to prevention and population health. Presenters are required to display their printed posters on poster boards during the Poster Presentation and Welcome Reception on the evening of Monday, March 27, 2023. The Poster Presentation format facilitates one-on-one and small group discussions with colleagues. Poster presenters will also be required to upload a pdf version of their poster for viewing by attendees in the conference app.
Student posters will be evaluated by faculty objective reviewers and award winners will be announced at the close of the meeting.
Student Lightning Round Presentations
Students are encouraged to submit their poster for consideration of an Oral Lightning Round presentation. This format is for a single presenter to share experience and knowledge on a subject that expands on their student poster presentation topic. (10 minutes including Q&A).
Student posters will be evaluated by faculty objective reviewers and award winners will be announced at the close of the meeting.
Student Lightning Round Presentations
Students are encouraged to submit their poster for consideration of an Oral Lightning Round presentation. This format is for a single presenter to share experience and knowledge on a subject that expands on their student poster presentation topic. (10 minutes including Q&A).
Important Dates
1. Reviews Complete: By January 6.
2. Notifications to Lead Presenters: January 13
Next Planning Committee Call
January 11, 2023
1:00 - 2:30 pm ET
Review and finalize presentation selections and discuss placement in program
2. Notifications to Lead Presenters: January 13
Next Planning Committee Call
January 11, 2023
1:00 - 2:30 pm ET
Review and finalize presentation selections and discuss placement in program
